Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMakeche, Chinyama Mauris
dc.contributor.authorNhiwatiwa, Tamuka
dc.contributor.authorChitondo, Lufeyo
dc.contributor.authorKanyati, Malvern
dc.contributor.authorKatongo, Cyprian
dc.contributor.authorKaminsa, Chipasha
dc.contributor.authorKaona, Mirriam
dc.contributor.authorNdebe, Joseph
dc.contributor.authorMulavu, Malala
dc.contributor.authorKhumalo, Sipho Cynthia
dc.contributor.authorSimulundu, Edgar
dc.contributor.authorChangula, Katendi
dc.contributor.authorChitanga, Simba
dc.contributor.authorMubemba, Benjamin
dc.contributor.authorMuleya, Walter
dc.contributor.authorMakwelele, Geofrey
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-25T10:05:30Z
dc.date.available2023-10-25T10:05:30Z
dc.date.issued2023-07
dc.identifier.issn2006-9839
dc.identifier.urihttp://dspace.chau.ac.zm:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/212
dc.description.abstractOreochromis niloticus were sampled from culture fisheries (Yalelo, Fwanyanga and Choombwe) (n = 211) in April and May, 2020. Capture fisheries (Siavonga and Sinazongwe) (n = 198) were sampled between April and November, 2020. The research was aimed to study the population parameters (growth rates, condition factors and natural mortality) of O. niloticus at Lake Kariba. The results showed that fish at culture fisheries exhibited positive growth (b > 3; b = 3.093) while fish at capture fisheries exhibited negative growth/negative allometry (b < 3; b = 2.24). The study established that fish at all the aquaculture farms were in good condition (Fulton’s condition factors were: Yalelo fishery K F = 1.95; Fwanyanga fishery K F = 1.77 and Choombwe fishery K F = 1.83). Fulton’s condition factors at both capture fisheries (K F = 1.91 at Siavonga and K F = 1.81 at Sinazongwe) were above the optimal value of 1.0, hence the studied fish were healthy and in good condition. Culture fisheries were in better condition than capture fisheries (K F for culture fisheries was 2.24 while K F for capture fisheries was 1.93). Fish from culture fisheries were growing faster than fish from capture fisheries (culture r 2 was 0.960 while capture r 2 was 0.555). It can be further concluded that the habitats at Lake Kariba are favourable for fish production and they are supporting healthy fish stocks. Natural mortality values at capture fisheries and culture fisheries were similar (M W capture = 0.142, M W culture = 0.122). The larger condition factors at culture fisheries than capture fisheries and the higher growth rates of fish from culture fisheries than capture fisheries coupled to the lower natural mortality values at culture fisheries than capture fisheries entail that the aquatic habitat at culture fisheries are better than those at capture fisheries at Lake Kariba.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherAcademic Journalsen_US
dc.subjectLake Karibaen_US
dc.subjectOreochromis Niloticusen_US
dc.subjectCaptures Fisheryen_US
dc.subjectCulture Fisheryen_US
dc.subjectCondition factoren_US
dc.subjectNatural Mortalityen_US
dc.titleComparative study of growth rates, condition factors and natural mortality of Oreochromis niloticus fish from culture fisheries and capture fisheries at Lake Kariba, Zambiaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record