• Login
    View Item 
    •   Chau Repository Home
    • Local Publications
    • Articles
    • View Item
    •   Chau Repository Home
    • Local Publications
    • Articles
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Comparative study of growth rates, condition factors and natural mortality of Oreochromis niloticus fish from culture fisheries and capture fisheries at Lake Kariba, Zambia

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    PUBLISHED MAKECHE JOURNAL ARTICLE (1).pdf (785.9Kb)
    Date
    2023-07
    Author
    Makeche, Chinyama Mauris
    Nhiwatiwa, Tamuka
    Chitondo, Lufeyo
    Kanyati, Malvern
    Katongo, Cyprian
    Kaminsa, Chipasha
    Kaona, Mirriam
    Ndebe, Joseph
    Mulavu, Malala
    Khumalo, Sipho Cynthia
    Simulundu, Edgar
    Changula, Katendi
    Chitanga, Simba
    Mubemba, Benjamin
    Muleya, Walter
    Makwelele, Geofrey
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Oreochromis niloticus were sampled from culture fisheries (Yalelo, Fwanyanga and Choombwe) (n = 211) in April and May, 2020. Capture fisheries (Siavonga and Sinazongwe) (n = 198) were sampled between April and November, 2020. The research was aimed to study the population parameters (growth rates, condition factors and natural mortality) of O. niloticus at Lake Kariba. The results showed that fish at culture fisheries exhibited positive growth (b > 3; b = 3.093) while fish at capture fisheries exhibited negative growth/negative allometry (b < 3; b = 2.24). The study established that fish at all the aquaculture farms were in good condition (Fulton’s condition factors were: Yalelo fishery K F = 1.95; Fwanyanga fishery K F = 1.77 and Choombwe fishery K F = 1.83). Fulton’s condition factors at both capture fisheries (K F = 1.91 at Siavonga and K F = 1.81 at Sinazongwe) were above the optimal value of 1.0, hence the studied fish were healthy and in good condition. Culture fisheries were in better condition than capture fisheries (K F for culture fisheries was 2.24 while K F for capture fisheries was 1.93). Fish from culture fisheries were growing faster than fish from capture fisheries (culture r 2 was 0.960 while capture r 2 was 0.555). It can be further concluded that the habitats at Lake Kariba are favourable for fish production and they are supporting healthy fish stocks. Natural mortality values at capture fisheries and culture fisheries were similar (M W capture = 0.142, M W culture = 0.122). The larger condition factors at culture fisheries than capture fisheries and the higher growth rates of fish from culture fisheries than capture fisheries coupled to the lower natural mortality values at culture fisheries than capture fisheries entail that the aquatic habitat at culture fisheries are better than those at capture fisheries at Lake Kariba.
    URI
    http://dspace.chau.ac.zm:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/212
    Collections
    • Articles

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
    Chalimbana homepage | Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    Atmire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of Chau RepositoryCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
    Chalimbana homepage | Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    Atmire NV